Frontier AI puts critical software at risk
AI systems can now find and exploit flaws that human reviewers miss.1
AI also writes code at a pace beyond human audit, and at a complexity beyond human comprehension.2
No software is trustworthy under these conditions, unless its correctness can be proven mathematically.
1 Anthropic, “Claude Mythos Preview,” 2026. 2 METR, “Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Tasks,” 2025.
A mathematical proof guarantees that a program behaves correctly on every possible input, not just the ones it was tested on.
Even when the code is too complex for a person to read, a trusted kernel can check the proof automatically.
The proof attaches to the compiled binary that runs on the machine, regardless of who or what wrote the code.
Introducing
A reasoner and a prover.
Tau works directly on your compiled binary, captures your intent as formal specifications, and proves them mathematically, returning either an audit-ready certificate of correctness or a report of the bugs that break them.
Tau is built on Talos, our open-source interpreter that lifts the binary into a form Tau can reason about formally.
Compiled binary
Correct
Proof certificate
Incorrect
Bug report
Backed by
